In People v Brantley, __ Mich App
__ (#298488, 5/17/2012) the Court of Appeals held that MCL 750.520n(1) requires
the trial court to impose lifetime electronic monitoring in either of two
different circumstances: (1) when any defendant is convicted of CSC-I
under MCL 750.520b, and (2) when a defendant who is 17 years old or older is
convicted of CSC-II under MCL 750.520c against a victim who is less than 13
years old.
Defendants convicted of CSC-I under MCL
750.520b, regardless of the age of the defendant or the age of the victim, must
be ordered to submit to lifetime electronic monitoring. MCL 750.520b(2)(d); MCL
750.520n(1). The Court of Appeals thereby held that the Legislature intended
the modifying phrase “for criminal sexual conduct committed by an individual 17
years old or older against an individual less than 13 years of age” to apply only
to convictions of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC-II) under MCL
750.520c, and not to convictions of CSC-I under MCL 750.520b.
No comments:
Post a Comment